After writing previous entry, I can’t help but reconsider about the double slit experiment. Though I’m not an expert on physics, several questions arose in me on the analyses of the double slit experiment.
1. Independency between each one-particle emission event isn’t clearly defined. One particle emission P01, one particle emission P02, P03… and one particle emission Pn are really mutually independent events from the viewpoint of causality? Isn’t it necessary to define and check independency among each emission event? Is particle emission the same as dice rolling? If the intervals between P01 and P100 were very large (100 years, one particle a year), would really the fringe pattern be same?
2. The concept of wave behavior is introduced without proof. Isn’t there a possibility of the effect that is similar to wave? Isn’t the coordinate system itself oscillating?
3. Physical events should be classified into two categories. a) An event definitely unreachable by human behavior caused by consciousness. b) An event containing certain possibilities of interference by human behavior caused by consciousness. The prediction law for the trajectory of the latter case b) is, as is obvious, different from former case.
If double slit experiments were conducted where human intention can’t reach, wouldn’t the results change?
